BJP, Opposition fight over Rajnath remarks on Savarkar & Bapu | India News


NEW DELHI: A fight broke out over the Defense Minister Rajnath singhcomments that the freedom fighter and the saffron icon Veer Savarkar had presented clemency petitions to the British at the behest of Mahatma Gandhi with the BJP presenting documents to support the claim of its party leader and opposition leaders criticizing the claim as “incorrect and unsustainable”.
AIMIM’s Asaduddin Owaisi He said: “Savarkar was an accessory to the murder of Mahatma Gandhi. BJP will soon declare Vinayak Damodar Savarkar as Father of the Nation ”. Congress leader Jairam Ramesh shared a letter from Gandhi and commented: “Rajnath ji is one of the few sober and dignified voices in Modi sarkar. But it doesn’t seem to be free from the RSS habit of rewriting history. It has put a twist on what Gandhi actually wrote on January 25, 1920. Here is the letter to Savarkar’s brother. ”
As social media flooded with mixed opinions, Savarkar’s biographer Vikram sampath came out in support of Singh and referred to the “Complete Works of Mahatma Gandhi”. He wrote: “I hope you do not say that Gandhi Ashram has tampered with these letters. I can’t spoon feed them more than this. ”
BJP IT department head Amit Malviya tweeted documents including Gandhi’s article in “Young India.” “The talents of the Savarkar brothers should be used for the public good. India runs the risk of losing her two faithful children, unless she wakes up on time. One of the brothers I know well. I had the pleasure of meeting him in London. He is brave. He is a patriot. He was frankly a revolutionary … He is in the Andamans for having loved India too much, ”Gandhi wrote in Young India on May 18, 1921, which was shared by Malviya.
Hailing Savarkar as a staunch nationalist and India’s first military strategist in the 20th century, Rajnath On Tuesday he had said that it was at the request of Mahatma Gandhi that he wrote clemency petitions to the British and people of Marxist and Leninist ideology wrongly accused him of being a fascist.
He also claimed that it was Moti Lal Nehru that he had applied for the early release of Jawahar Lal Nehru in September 1923.

Source link


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here