Bombay HC asks Centre to respond on PM Cares Fund plea | India News

0
55


MUMBAI: On Tuesday, the Bombay High Court sought the Center’s response to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), seeking instructions for the Prime Minister. Narendra modi immediately take steps to remove the word “Prime Minister” and his image from the PM Cares Fund website and your trust deed. It has also sought the removal of the national emblem and flag.
A bench of Justices Amjad Sayed and SG Dige heard the PIL presented by Vikrant Chavan, Speaker of the Thane District Congress. Modi He becomes a defendant because he is president of the fund and liquidator of the deed.
Chavan’s petition establishes that Modi, on March 27, 2020, executed a trust deed that constitutes the Prime Minister’s Fund for Citizen Relief and Assistance in Emergency Situations, which is supposedly a public charitable trust. However, the use of the name Prime Minister, its pictorial representation, the national emblem and the name of the national flag violates the provisions of the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Misuse) Act 1950 and the State Emblem Act of the United States. India (Prohibition of Misuse), 2007, and its rules.
The PIL states that Modi, who is considered the trustee of the constitutional trust, is expected to preserve the sanctity of names, emblems and pictorial representations. However, they were used to solicit donations in digital and traditional media across the country.
Chavan’s petition also states that the Fund does not perform any royal, governmental or sovereign function and “is not the offspring or the blood and bones or the voice and hands of the Government of India.” “ In fact, it has been an admitted position that it is not a fund of the Government of India and the amount raised does not go to the Consolidated Fund of India, ” he said, adding that as of March 31, 2020, more than Rs 3,076 were collected crore.
Chavan’s defenders, Suhas Oak and Sagar Joshi, argued that a clause in the trust deed states that the fund is not created by or under the Constitution or by any law of the Parliament or any state legislature. Also, it is not under the control of the central or state government.
Additional Attorney General Anil Singh sought time to receive instructions, after which the judges published the matter for the next hearing on October 26.





Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here