Noting that it cannot encourage the filing of “bogus” public interest litigation (PIL) by attorneys, a court headed by Judge DY Chandrachud said the statement is “public interest litigation” and has not been not a single relevant reason raised in it.
The court, which also includes judges Vikram Nath and BV Nagarathna, said that several people have died due to Covid-19 in the country and that there is already a ruling issued by the higher court dealing with the elaboration of the guidelines for the Disbursement of compensation to the relatives of those who have died as a result of the coronavirus.
“Aren’t other people in society important,” the court told defender Pradeep Kumar Yadav, who had filed the petition.
“This is a publicity interest litigation and just because he is dressed in black does not mean that his life is more precious than anyone else’s,” the bank observed, adding: “We should not encourage lawyers to present false PILs. “.
The higher court, which noted that “cut-copy-paste” has been done in the guilty plea, said that it would not happen that lawyers file PIL in this way to demand compensation and the court will allow it.
He said that several people have died from Covid-19 and lawyers cannot be an exception.
Yadav asked the bank to withdraw the statement and present it on better grounds.
However, the court dismissed the petition at a cost of Rs 10,000 payable to the Supreme Court Bar Association within a week.
In his plea, Yadav had organized the Center, Indian Bar Council and several other organs of the bar as respondents.
The petition had sought instructions for the defendants to pay ex-gratia of Rs 50 lakh to the defender’s relatives, who died within 60 years, either from Covid-19 or otherwise, and in pandemic cases, it was will provide additional monetary assistance. to them.