Lakhimpur Kheri violence ‘absolutely condemnable’: Sitharaman | India News


BOSTON: The Lakhimpur Kheri The violence, in which four farmers were killed, is “absolutely reprehensible,” the finance minister said. Nirmala Sitharaman he has said, stressing that there are issues of this nature that are happening in other parts of India as well that should be raised “when they happen and not when it suits others” because there is a BJP government in Uttar Pradesh.
Sitharaman, who is on an official visit to the US, responded to a question during a conversation at Harvard’s Kennedy School on Tuesday about the murder of four farmers in Lakhimpur Kheri and the arrest of Ashish Mishra, the Minister’s son. State of the Union for the Home. Ajay Mishra.
He was asked why there is no news on this from the Prime Minister, senior ministers and why there is a “defensive reaction” when someone asks questions about such things.
“No, absolutely not… It’s nice of you to have caught that incident that is absolutely reprehensible, we all say that. Likewise, there are cases that happen in other places, it is my concern.
“India has problems of this nature that occur in many different parts of the country alike. I would like you and many others including Dr. Amartya Sen who is all familiar with India to bring it up every time it happens, not just bring it up when it suits us because it is a state where BJP is in power, one of my Cabinet colleague’s son is probably in trouble, and he also assumes that it’s actually they who did it and no one else. The due course of justice will also have a full investigation process to establish it, ”he said.
“And it is not being on the defensive with my party or my prime minister. It is being on the defensive with India. I will speak for India, I will speak for justice for the poor. They won’t make fun of me. And if it’s a joke, I’ll be on the defensive to stand up and say ‘Sorry, let’s talk the facts.’ That is my answer to you, ”he said.
Ashish Mishra was named to an FIR following allegations that he was in one of the vehicles that hit four farmers protesting the senior vice minister of UP. Keshav Prasad Maurya’s visit on October 3.
Asked about the farmers’ protests, Sitharaman said that the three acts introduced by the government were discussed by the various parliamentary committees for a decade.
He said the three acts have been discussed in various ways by state governments, by the Center after the BJP came to power in 2014.
“This has been brewing for a decade. All interested parties have been consulted,” he said.
“When agricultural laws were introduced in Lok Sabha, there was an elaborate discussion and the minister of agriculture also gave his answer. It was only when it came to Rajya sabha, there was a lot of noise and disturbances, “he said.
Thousands of farmers from Punjab, Haryana and several other states have been protesting at various borders in Delhi since November 26 last year, seeking the repeal of three agricultural laws enacted in September.
Dubbing these laws “anti-farmer,” these farmers claim that the newly enacted legislation would pave the way for the dismantling of the minimum support price system, leaving them at the “mercy” of large corporations.
Sitharaman said the protesters belong to one state and some parts of other states: “Punjab, Haryana and some parts of western Uttar Pradesh.”
He said the government has been saying that it is willing to speak to the protesters and has engaged with them.
The government has clearly asked what is that aspect of any of the three laws that have been passed and that protesters oppose, he said. “We are willing to talk about it, tell us that particular aspect in any of the three laws. To date, we have not had a single aspect in particular that is being questioned. And therefore the protesters are not sure to what extent they are protesting, what they are objecting to.
“Then there is the issue of the minimum support price that should be given to farmers,” he said, adding that MSPs are announced on time and farmers can decide whether they want to grow a crop or not and otherwise they can choose. to be cultivated. anything else.
She said that once farmers choose to grow any of these, for which a minimum support price is announced and acquisitions are made, by direct transfer of benefits using technology, the money is deposited as a lump sum into their accounts.
“The largest number of acquisitions, the largest payment ever made per farmer below the declared minimum subsistence price has occurred in the last seven years after the arrival of Prime Minister (Narendra) Modi. The highest of all.
“The number of farmers, the total amount of money, the total amount of grain purchased in each of them, the highest, as has happened season after season in the last seven years,” he said.
Noting that there are recorded conversations “that can be seen from farmers even from Punjab, even from Haryana,” he said farmers have the full amount in their account.
“This is verifiable, not a claim that I am making. You can go and check it out. The highest amount and the total amount is credited to the account directly the day after the purchase is made. No chills, no delay, ”he said.
“So they still haven’t told us what they are protesting and the minister is willing to speak even today.”

Source link


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here