Made prior nod mandatory for ex-intel officers to write books to prevent ‘loss to country’, says government | India News
In response to a query on the Rajya sabha, Minister of State for Personnel Jitendra singh He explained that “prior to (the) amendment, the concerned official had to decide whether the published material fell into the prescribed prohibited categories or not.”
“In case the official feels that the material he is going to publish does not fall under the category of prohibited, then he could publish the material without the prior approval of the government. Later, in case the government concludes that the published material belongs / falls within the category of prohibited material, a loss would have already occurred for the country. To prevent this type of situation, the current amendment has been made ”, he explained.
The amendment dated May 31, 2021, in Rule 8 of the Central Civil Services (Pensions) Rules of 1972, related to the serious misconduct of a pensioner and the action against such misconduct, which expanded the scope of the restriction on retired intelligence officers did not set a time bar in terms of post-retirement applicability.
Any serious misconduct, if proven against the pensioner, may lead to the retention or withdrawal of his pension, either totally or partially.
Singh informed the Rajya Sabha on Thursday that stakeholders, the intelligence and security organizations included in Second Annex of the RTI Law – were consulted through the administrative department / ministry before the modifications notified on May 31, 2021.
The revised pension rules, which many retired intelligence chiefs chose to dismiss as a “gag order,” appear to be aimed at verifying incidents by retired intelligence officials, including those who have run organizations such as Intelligence Office or RAW, spilling the beans on the operation of these agencies or even on delicate operations, in books they write after retirement. Some of these books have ended up generating controversy.