A bench of the Chief Justice DN Patel and Judge Jyoti Singh said that in view of the firm’s position, they would hear the pleas on August 27.
“They have made a statement that until the personal data protection bill is finalized, they will not be transferred. There is another matter before this court in which they have made the statement. This is not so urgent now, ”the court said.
Lead attorney Kapil Sibal, who appears on WhatsApp, told the court that based on his client’s position, the accounts of those who do not accept the new policy will not be deleted for the time being.
“We said we won’t block,” Sibal said.
Lead Attorney Vivek Sood, which appeared for one of the petitioners, Harsha Gupta, highlighted that even if the 2021 policy is kept on hold, data can still be transferred under the pre-2021 policy.
“That they make a statement that they will not transfer data,” Sood asked the court.
Lawyer Manohar Lal, representing another petitioner, Chaitanya Rohilla, stated that his complaint did not refer to the personal messages sent through the platform, but to the Goal data that is shared with Facebook.
Meghan, a lawyer who has challenged the policy along with two other people, also raised issues regarding user privacy.
“Okay, we are considering it. There is no use of WhatsApp, making statements over and over again, ”the court stated.
“The commitment is that I will not do anything until the law of Parliament enters. Yes Parliament allow it, I’ll have it. If not, too bad, I have taken it off until Parliament passes a law. Either we fit in or we don’t, ”said lead attorney Harish Salve, who appeared on WhatsApp.
The Personal Data Protection Bill seeks to regulate the use of individual data by the government and private companies. The Joint Committee of Parliament examining the bill has been granted an extension until the monsoon session to present its report.
In its response, WhatsApp claimed that the new policy did not affect a user’s privacy, as personal messages continued to be protected by end-to-end encryption.
WhatsApp has also questioned the maintenance of the auto petitions against him.