Often being the first to come to court before attorney Prashant Bhushan’s clients in PIL’s presentation in SC on major public controversies, including the coal scam and alleged irregularities in the Rafale deal, Sharma petitioned the higher court to ask why and under what procedure did the Union government buy the spyware for espionage purposes.
He also demanded to know the expenses incurred for the purchase of the Israeli spyware, which its owner NSO sells only to governments. Make the PM a respondent by name along with all members of the Union Council of Ministers, Sharma requested the SC to constitute an SIT and oversee their investigations into the “Pegasus scandal and prosecute all defendants / ministers for purchasing Pegasus and spying on citizens of India, including judges, opposition leaders and individuals politicians, activists, defenders and others of their political interest created from 2017 to date ”.
In seeking a statement that the use of Pegasus by the government or any of its agencies was illegal, the petitioner said that those responsible for the alleged purchase of the spyware without prior authorization from Parliament You must request a refund from the treasury of an equal amount with interest. The petitioner said that at a time when the government bypasses the opposition and refuses to respond to anything related to the purchase and use of Pegasus, it is only the SC that could fix accountability by going to the root. of the problem: who reached an agreement with the Israeli NSO for the purchase of the spyware. Sharma said that BJP The government could not take refuge behind the common excuse that the espionage took place during the UPA government led by Congress on a much larger scale and must answer for the privacy violation, which a court of nine SC judges has held. ruled to be an integral part of the right to life guaranteed by article 21 of the Constitution.