‘Prasada Politics’: Kapil Sibal criticizes fellow letter writer Jitin for joining BJP | India News

'Prasada Politics': Kapil Sibal criticizes fellow letter writer Jitin for joining BJP |  India News

NEW DELHI: Kapil sibal, a prominent member of the group of 23 congressional leaders who wrote to the party chief Sonia Gandhi seeking an organizational review last year, on Thursday he criticized a fellow signatory to the letter Jitin prasada for turning to the BJP and said it represented a policy of “prasada” or personal gain.
The veteran congressional leader also hypothetically said that if his party thinks of him as “dead wood” or worthless, he might think about leaving, but would never join the BJP, stating that such a change could only happen “on my corpse.” .
In an interview with PTI, Sibal said that if Jitin Prasada had left the party unhappy with the leadership’s response to the concerns raised by the letter writers, that would have been his personal choice and he had the right to leave, but wondered why he decided. . to join the BJP.
“What is the rational basis for that, except the policy of ‘prasada (personal benefit)? We see this happening all over the country,” Sibal said.
Asked about the reforms that are not being implemented and that he along with 22 other leaders had requested from the party, Sibal said that it is the decision of the top political leaders and that at this stage he has no comment to offer.
“As long as we are in Congress and continue to embrace its ideology, I believe that the 22, now that we are 22, and many more who were not part of the signed document, we will continue to raise our problems to strengthen Congress and where we want the party to go and be. what a great game that was, “he said.
“And if at some point they tell me that they do not need me, I will decide what to do, but as I said I will not join the BJP … because of my corpse,” said the senior congressional leader. .
In a previous tweet, Sibal had said that the question is whether Jitin Prasada will get “prasada” from the BJP, or is it simply a “gimmick” for the UP elections.
In such deals, if ‘ideology’ doesn’t matter, change is easy, he tweeted.
After criticizing Jitin Prasada’s change to the BJP and praising the saffron party, Sibal told PTI that the norm in politics now is “Prasada will go for prasada.”
“From Aaya Ram Gaya Ram we are in the politics of ‘prasada (personal benefit). We saw this happen recently in West Bengal where people en masse left the TMC and joined the BJP in hopes of competing on a BJP ticket. and win because Amit shah he claimed more than 200 for the BJP. When they faced defeat, everyone wants to go back to TMC, “Sibal said.
‘Aaya Ram Gaya Ram’ was an expression widely used in politics in the 1990s to refer to the frequent floor crossing and party change.
Sibal said all this shows that there is no principled policy concept in this country, as witnessed in West Bengal, Madhya Pradesh and Karnataka, among other places, criticizing changes of leaders to the BJP in various states.
“It’s about prasada. How much prasada are you going to get, without respect for ideology. My criticism of what he (Jitin) has done is not that he left the party; I cannot criticize him for that, it is his personal decision .. But how does he justify himself to join the BJP? ”he said.
“This is a party that (Jitin) abused for decades. He himself said that his association with Congress and his ideology was for several decades. How then does he justify joining an ideology that he has opposed for three decades,” Sibal asked.
The former Union minister said that what worries him is the way in which ideology is being put aside throughout the country. He cited the example of Haryana and the lack of foundation in the Chautalas coalition and the BJP. It’s just lust for power, he claimed.
In pressing his point, Sibal cited the example of the US and the UK, saying that the Republicans may be in trouble right now, but they are not joining the Democrats in the US. the Labor Party and the Conservatives in the UK.
“Members of parliaments in Europe do not allow themselves such acrobatic changes for personal gain. Those are also functional democracies. Democracy in this country has become dysfunctional because it is not based on ideology,” Sibal said.
The struggle for power must be based on the clash of ideologies and not on personal “prasadas”, he said.
When asked if he could ever think of leaving the party that he has been in for decades, Sibal said: “If the party considers that I have no value to it, I might think about leaving it, but I would never join the BJP. I am married to a particular ideology. ”
“Politics is not for personal gain, embracing ideologies that party members do not believe just for a Rajya Sabha seat or a party position or some other position. That is not my idea of ​​politics,” he said.
Sibal expressed concern about the growing trend of leaders switching between diametrically opposed ideologies, and said that the other real problem is that when people see politicians who behave in this way, they believe that these politicians are not trustworthy, they have no principles and they have no ideology.
This has nothing to do with values-based politics. If workers see their leaders abandon values-based politics, they too will do the same, Sibal argued.
“That weakens the foundations of democracy, the people’s trust in democratic principles, and if the foundations of democracy weaken, the structure will one day collapse. My concern is that my concern is not that Jitin Prasada will walk away from Congress.” He said. saying.
Sibal also criticized the BJP for welcoming ‘prasada politics’. His actions are equally unprincipled, he added.


Source link